The Morality of Euthanasia Under what conditions does Rachels think that active euthanasia is morally permissible? When it is in the best interests of the patient c.
Please be patient while it loads! The zip-file will automatically uncompress and you can view it offline on your browser. A selected bibliography from mainstream journals with sample quotations This page will provide you with source references that you can cut and paste.
The sample quotations may give you an idea of the usefulness of that reference as well as the writing style. Remember that you should check all references yourself by Morality of euthanasia the articles from your library personally.
No guarantees are made about the accuracy of the text quoted here. This will enable you rapidly to find, say, all the articles and quotations containing the word "Kevorkian" or "Substituted Judgement".
You are theth visitor since 15 Jan using the above URL. Journal of American Geriatrics Society, May43 5: When a physician Morality of euthanasia either equipment or medication, or informs the patient of the most efficacious use of already available means, for the sole purpose of assisting the patient to end his or her own life.
When, at the request of the patient, a physician administers a medication or treatment, the sole intent of which is to end the patient's life.
Canadian Medical Association Journal9: Treatment of incompetent elderly patients with life-threatening illness varies widely within and between countries. Uniform standards should be developed on the basis of societal values and be communicated to physicians. Family physicians were more likely than specialists to choose more conservative therapy.
This was true even when the wishes were expressed in an explicit written directive. Journal of American Medical Association, August 9,6: Many members of the public assume that taking a lethal dose of medication is certain to lead to a peaceful death.
Physicians need to help patients appreciate that the attempt may fail, that complications such as aspiration pneumonia may occur, and that reflex actions may lead patients to struggle against plastic bags placed over their heads.
Patients and their families should also be cautioned about telephoning if the suicide attempt fails. New England Journal of Medicine ; The document is a will in the sense that it spells out the person's directions. It is "living" because it takes effect before death.
Some Massachusetts attorneys, for example, have already drafted a page, single-spaced proxy form that is all but unintelligible to non-lawyers. This is a serious error for at least two reasons. When Procedures Limit Rights: From Quinlan to Conroy.
Hastings Center Report Apr: A proposed advance directive format for South Australia. Australian Health Law Bulletin ; 2 7: Patient requests and Physician Responses.
Journal of the American Medical Association Physicians do not consult each other often about these cases. Drafting Wills in Scotland. It might be argued that the physician's duty of mercy derives from a special contractual or fiduciary relationship with the patient, but I think this is an error: It is true that the Oath, in its original form, does contain an explicit injunction that the physician shall not give a lethal potion to a patient who requests it, nor make a suggestion to that effect.
To do so was apparently common Greek medical practice at the time. But the Oath in its original form also contains explicit prohibitions of the physicians accepting fees for teaching medicine, and of performing surgery - even on gall stones.
These latter prohibitions are not retained in modern reformulations of the Oath, and I see no reason why the provision against giving lethal potions to patients who request it should be.
What is central to the Oath and cannot be deleted without altering its essential character is the requirement that the physician shall come "for the benefit of the sick". Under the argument advanced here, physician's assistance in patient suicide may indeed be for the benefit of the patient.
What the Oath would continue to prohibit is physician assistance in the suicide for the physician's own gain or to serve other institutional or societal ends. To do so is to deprive the patient of the possibility of retaining his or her status as a moral agent, and to make him or her a "patient" in not only a medical but a moral sense as well.Ethics, also called moral philosophy, the discipline concerned with what is morally good and bad, right and wrong.
The term is also applied to any system or theory of moral values or principles.. How should we live?
Shall we aim at happiness or at knowledge, virtue, or the creation of beautiful objects?If we choose happiness, will it be our own or the happiness of all? EUGENICS AND EUTHANASIA QUOTATIONS IN MODERN TIMES. Like totalitarianism, eugenics and euthanasia have very deep roots in world history.
Drawing on the example of the Spartans in his time, Plato specifically endorsed murdering "weak" children in favor of the "strong".
Similarly, he advocated that only men and women with superior characteristics be allowed to mate and bear children. Is Euthanasia Morally Acceptable?
Euthanasia means “good death” because it is supposed to be a way for someone to die with dignity. to establish a solid foundation for morality, to answer the question of ultimate explanation, and other great questions of life.
“Eu thanatos” is the Greek origin for Euthanasia, which means “good death”. Euthanasia has come to mean the intentional ending of a life . Is suicide moral or immoral? Is it right to terminate life? What about euthanasia, mercy-killing, or assisted suicide?
Does the Bible say these are murder? Philosophical approaches to the dilemma of death with dignity Elizabeth Telfer Dr Elizabeth Telfer is a senior lecturer in the Department of Philosophy at the University of Glasgow, where she lectures on contemporary moral issues, including euthanasia.